The role of ligand flexibility in predicting biological activity: Structure–activity relationships for aryl hydrocarbon, estrogen, and androgen receptor binding affinity
Open Access
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Vol. 17 (1) , 15-25
- https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620170103
Abstract
Recent studies indicate that the potency and agonist or antagonist activity of steroid hormone ligands are dependent, in part, on ligand–receptor binding affinity as well as the conformation of the ligand–receptor complex. The binding of ligands to hormone receptors is thought to involve interactions by which shapes of both the receptor and ligand are modified in the formation of the ligand–receptor complex. As a consequence, it is essential to explore the significance of ligand flexibility in the development of screening-level structure–activity relationships. In this review, examples are provided of techniques used to generate and screen ligand conformers in the development of quantitative structure–activity relationships and active analogue search algorithms. The biological endpoint modeled was binding affinity of natural ligands and xenobiotics to the aryl hydrocarbon, estrogen, and androgen receptors. These approaches may be useful in future studies to evaluate relationships between ligand structure, receptor binding affinity, and, ultimately, transactivational events associated with receptor interactions with DNA response elements and associated proteins. An improved understanding of ligand–receptor interactions in the context of well-defined effector systems will enhance the development of credible predictive models that can be used to screen large sets of chemicals for potential agonist or antagonistic activity.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- U.S. EPA Regulatory Perspectives on the Use of QSAR for New and Existing Chemical EvaluationsSAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 1995
- QSAR Evaluation of .alpha.-Terthienyl PhototoxicityEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1995
- Molecular modeling of steroidal estrogens: Novel conformations and their role in biological activityThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1994
- Predicting Modes of Toxic Action from Chemical Structure: An OverviewSAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 1994
- Differences in the form of the salt-transformed estrogen receptor when bound by estrogen versus antiestrogenThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1990
- An alternative method for the alignment of molecular structures: Maximizing electrostatic and steric overlapTetrahedron Computer Methodology, 1990
- The calculation of molar polarizabilities by the CNDO/2 method: Correlation with the hydrophobic parameter, log PJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1989
- The molecular structure of 16α-iodo-17β-estradiol, a high affinity ligand for the estrogen receptorJournal of Steroid Biochemistry, 1986
- Binding of polychlorinated biphenyls classified as either phenobarbitone-, 3-methylcholanthrene- or mixed-type inducers to cytosolic Ah receptorChemico-Biological Interactions, 1982
- The specificity of the estrogen receptor of human uterusJournal of Steroid Biochemistry, 1973