Evaluation of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II. Part 2. Results from a population with induced visual field defects.
Open Access
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 68 (7) , 463-467
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.68.7.463
Abstract
The Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II is evaluated with a group of 301 normal eyes, 155 of which had an induced visual field defect. Measures of sensitivity and specificity are calculated from these data by criteria similar to those used by other researchers. The inadequacies of using pass/fail criteria in the clinical situation are discussed, and a solution is proposed in which each field response is scored and the score compared with those from normal and defective populations. An example is given of how this form of analysis could be incorporated into the clinical situation.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detecting Glaucomatous Damage with the Friedmann Analyzer Compared with the Goldmann Perimeter and Evaluation of Stereoscopic Photographs of the Optic DiskAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1983
- Performance of computer assisted perimetersDocumenta Ophthalmologica, 1982
- The Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II - Technical evaluation and clinical resultsDocumenta Ophthalmologica, 1982
- Comparative Evaluation of the Autofield-I®,CFA-120,® and Fieldmaster Model 101-PR® Automated PerimetersOphthalmology, 1980
- The glaucomatous visual field.1972