Clinical application of otoacoustic emissions: What do we know about factors influencing measurement and analysis?

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Three electrophysiologic audiologic procedures‐aural immittance measurement, auditory brainstem response (ABR), and otoacoustic emissions (OAE) — were first described in the 1970's. Immittance measurement and ABR have contributed importantly for years to the assessment of auditory function in children and adults, whereas OAEs have not yet been incorporated into the everyday audiology test battery. In this article, we argue that the transition from OAE measurement by hearing scientists in laboratory settings to routine application by audiologists in the clinic will be greatly facilitated by (1) comprehensive, large‐scale studies of the effects of subject characteristics, such as gender and age (from infancy to advancing adulthood), on both transient evoked (TEOAE) and distortion product (DPOAE) otoacoustic emissions; (2) clinical investigations of TEOAE and DPOAE in sizeable patient populations with specific neurotologic diagnoses; (3) guidelines for OAE test protocols in clinical environments; and (4) clear criteria for OAE analysis in clinical populations.