What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 3 February 2009
- journal article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 6 (2) , e1000023
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023
Abstract
Ghostwriting occurs when someone makes substantial contributions to a manuscript without attribution or disclosure. It is considered bad publication practice in the medical sciences, and some argue it is scientific misconduct. At its extreme, medical ghostwriting involves pharmaceutical companies hiring professional writers to produce papers promoting their products but hiding those contributions and instead naming academic physicians or scientists as the authors. To improve transparency, many editors' associations and journals allow professional medical writers to contribute to the writing of papers without being listed as authors provided their role is acknowledged. This debate examines how best to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature from the perspectives of a researcher, an editor, and the professional medical writer.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reporting Bias in Drug Trials Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of Publication and PresentationPLoS Medicine, 2008
- International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP)position statement: the role of the professional medical writerCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2007
- Full publication of results initially presented in abstractsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2007
- Authors, Ghosts, Damned Lies, and StatisticiansPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Ghost Authorship in Industry-Initiated Randomised TrialsPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Patient Safety Requires a New Way to Publish Clinical TrialsPLoS Clinical Trials, 2006
- The Status of Peer ReviewClinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2005
- Medical Journals Are an Extension of the Marketing Arm of Pharmaceutical CompaniesPLoS Medicine, 2005
- European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publicationsCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2005
- When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountableJAMA, 1997