The Ortega Hypothesis
- 27 October 1972
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 178 (4059) , 368-375
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4059.368
Abstract
Let us consider, then, some general conclusions that may be drawn from the findings reported in this study. The data allow us to question the view stated by Ortega, Florey, and others that large numbers of average scientists contribute substantially to the advance of science through their research. It seems, rather, that a relatively small number of physicists produce work that becomes the base for future discoveries in physics. We have found that even papers of relatively minor significance have used to a disproportionate degree the work of the eminent scientists. Although the conclusions of this paper may be reasonably clear, the implications of these data for the structure of scientific activity, at least in physics, need careful consideration.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Future Market for Ph.D.'sScience, 1971
- Visibility and the Structural Bases of Awareness of Scientific ResearchAmerican Sociological Review, 1968
- Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in ScienceAmerican Sociological Review, 1967
- Nobel Laureates in Science: Patterns of Productivity, Collaboration, and AuthorshipAmerican Sociological Review, 1967
- Little Science, Big SciencePublished by Columbia University Press ,1963
- Scientific Productivity and Academic Organization in Nineteenth Century MedicineAmerican Sociological Review, 1960
- The Course of Arabian Intellectual Development, 700-1300 A.D. A Study in MethodIsis, 1935