Provision of health promotion clinics in relation to population need: another example of the inverse care law?
- 1 February 1992
- journal article
- Vol. 42 (355) , 54-6
Abstract
The new contract encourages health promotion in general practice. The aim of this study was to explore the pattern of provision of health promotion clinics across one family health services authority and to relate this to possible indicators of health need in the practice population. Single-handed practices were less likely to be running health promotion clinics. The proportion of practices running clinics increased with increasing numbers of partners. Practices located in wards where the standardized mortality ratio was greater than 100, and practices receiving deprivation payments were less likely to be offering health promotion clinics. This was explained by the presence of most single-handed practitioners in deprived, historically unhealthy wards. If effective, health promotion clinics will have tended to benefit populations in Bedfordshire at lower risk of ill-health. Other shortcomings of the clinic-based health promotion model are discussed.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- General practices and the new contract. I--Reactions and impact.BMJ, 1991
- Alcohol abuse.BMJ, 1991
- Health promotion in general practice.BMJ, 1991
- Second thoughts on the Jarman index.BMJ, 1991
- Calculation of the underprivileged area score for a practice in inner London.1991
- If preventable, why not...?BMJ, 1990
- The population mean predicts the number of deviant individuals.BMJ, 1990
- Health promotion under the new contract.1990
- Health checks in general practice: another example of inverse care?BMJ, 1990
- Facilitating prevention in primary care.BMJ, 1984