Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Versus Digitally Directed Prostatic Biopsy: A Comparative Study
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 139 (4) , 754-757
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42623-1
Abstract
A total of 45 patients was evaluated with palpable prostatic nodules by digitally directed and ultrasonically guided biopsies. Of 14 patients with carcinoma tumor was detected by both techniques in 11. Of the remaining 3 patients, 2 had positive findings only with the digitally directed biopsy and 1 only with the ultrasound guided biopsy. The study indicates that ultrasound guided prostatic biopsy in not necessary as a routine procedure when a distinct nodule is palpable.This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Routine Screening for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate on Stage DistributionJournal of Urology, 1987
- Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Prostate Gland: A Study of 103 Cases With Histological FollowupJournal of Urology, 1986
- Fine Needle Aspiration of the Abnormal Prostate: A Cytohistological CorrelationJournal of Urology, 1986
- Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection and Sepsis Following Transrectal Prostatic BiopsyJournal of Urology, 1982
- Ultrasonically Guided Precise Needle Placement in the Prostate and the Seminal VesiclesJournal of Urology, 1981
- Needle Biopsy of the Prostate: A Re-evaluationJournal of Urology, 1962
- CYTOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATIC TUMOURS BY TRANSRECTAL ASPIRATION BIOPSY: A PRELIMINARY REPORTBritish Journal of Urology, 1960
- SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PALPABLE PROSTATIC NODULEJAMA, 1956
- Further Experience with Transrectal Biopsy of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1955
- Carcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1954