Insights into Long-Lasting Protection Induced by RTS,S/AS02A Malaria Vaccine: Further Results from a Phase IIb Trial in Mozambican Children
Open Access
- 14 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 4 (4) , e5165
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005165
Abstract
The pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccine RTS,S/AS02A has shown to confer protection against clinical malaria for at least 21 months in a trial in Mozambican children. Efficacy varied between different endpoints, such as parasitaemia or clinical malaria; however the underlying mechanisms that determine efficacy and its duration remain unknown. We performed a new, exploratory analysis to explore differences in the duration of protection among participants to better understand the protection afforded by RTS,S. The study was a Phase IIb double-blind, randomized controlled trial in 2022 children aged 1 to 4 years. The trial was designed with two cohorts to estimate vaccine efficacy against two different endpoints: clinical malaria (cohort 1) and infection (cohort 2). Participants were randomly allocated to receive three doses of RTS,S/AS02A or control vaccines. We did a retrospective, unplanned sub-analysis of cohort 2 data using information collected for safety through the health facility-based passive case detection system. Vaccine efficacy against clinical malaria was estimated over the first six-month surveillance period (double-blind phase) and over the following 12 months (single-blind phase), and analysis was per-protocol. Adjusted vaccine efficacy against first clinical malaria episodes in cohort 2 was of 35.4% (95% CI 4.5–56.3; p = 0.029) over the double-blind phase and of 9.0% (−30.6–36.6; p = 0.609) during the single-blind phase. Contrary to observations in cohort 1, where efficacy against clinical malaria did not wane over time, in cohort 2 the efficacy decreases with time. We hypothesize that this reduced duration of protection is a result of the early diagnosis and treatment of infections in cohort 2 participants, preventing sufficient exposure to asexual-stage antigens. On the other hand, the long-term protection against clinical disease observed in cohort 1 may be a consequence of a prolonged exposure to low-dose blood-stage asexual parasitaemia. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00197041Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safety and Immunogenicity of RTS,S/AS02D Malaria Vaccine in InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Efficacy of RTS,S/AS01E Vaccine against Malaria in Children 5 to 17 Months of AgeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Antibodies to Pre‐erythrocyticPlasmodium falciparumAntigens and Risk of Clinical Malaria in Kenyan ChildrenThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2008
- How is childhood development of immunity to Plasmodium falciparum enhanced by certain antimalarial interventions?Malaria Journal, 2007
- Measurement of malaria vaccine efficacy in phase III trials: Report of a WHO consultationVaccine, 2007
- Protection of Humans against Malaria by Immunization with Radiation‐AttenuatedPlasmodium falciparumSporozoitesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Efficacy of Recombinant Circumsporozoite Protein Vaccine Regimens against ExperimentalPlasmodium falciparumMalariaThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2001
- A Preliminary Evaluation of a Recombinant Circumsporozoite Protein Vaccine againstPlasmodium falciparumMalariaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Attributable fraction estimates and case definitions for malaria in endemicStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Plasmodium falciparum: Immunogenicity of circumsporozoite protein constructs produced in Escherichia coliExperimental Parasitology, 1987