Allometry for Sexual Size Dimorphism: Pattern and Process in the Coevolution of Body Size in Males and Females
- 1 November 1997
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Vol. 28 (1) , 659-687
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.659
Abstract
Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is common in both plants and animals, and current evidence suggests that it reflects the adaptation of males and females to their different reproductive roles. When species are compared within a clade, SSD is frequently found to vary with body size. This allometry is detected as beta not equal 1, where beta is the slope of a model II regression of log(male size) on log(female size). Most frequently, beta exceeds 1, indicating that SSD increases with size where males are the larger sex, but decreases with size where females are larger, a trend formalized as "Rensch's rule.' Exceptions are uncommon and associated with female-biased SSD. These trends are derived from a sample of 40 independent clades of terrestrial animals, primarily vertebrates. Their extension to plants and aquatic animals awaits quantitative assessments of allometry far SSD within these groups. Many functional hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of allometry for SSD, most featuring sexual selection on males or reproductive selection on females. Of these, the hypothesis that allometry evolves because of correlational selection between the sexes appears most promising as a general model but remains untested.Keywords
This publication has 134 references indexed in Scilit:
- Truth or Consequences: Effects of Phylogenetic Accuracy on Two Comparative MethodsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1994
- Sexual dimorphism inAnastrepha suspensa (Loew) and other tephritid fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): Possible roles of developmental rate, fecundity, and dispersalJournal of Insect Behavior, 1992
- A method for the analysis of comparative dataJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1992
- The uniqueness of the phylogenetic regressionJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1992
- A phylogenetic interpretation of sexual dimorphism in body size and ornament in relation to mating system in birdsJournal of Evolutionary Biology, 1990
- Sexual size dimorphism in parasitoid waspsBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1987
- Sexual dimorphism in body size: Are larger species more dimorphic?Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1986
- Phylogenies and the Comparative MethodThe American Naturalist, 1985
- Sexual size dimorphism in relation to resource partitioning in North American dabbling ducksCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1984
- On rethinking allometryJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1982