Surgical abortion at twenty weeks: is morality determined solely by the outcome?
Open Access
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 15 (2) , 82-85
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.15.2.82
Abstract
A strong body of opinion contends that late terminations of pregnancy are better carried out by surgical methods. We show that the suggested advantages of greater safety and patient acceptance are based on out-of-date or inaccurate (biased) data. The advantages of medical methods are, however, equally unproven. However, we argue that the adverse emotional and symbolic effects of late surgical termination have moral force. We therefore contend that in the absence of strong patient preference, medical termination is the preferable method; and will remain of that opinion unless clear demonstration of the greater safety of surgical methods can be made at some future date.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Doctors and AdvertisingThe Lancet, 1988
- Midtrimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation versus intra-amniotic instillation of prostaglandin F2α: A randomized clinical trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1980
- What the fetus feels.BMJ, 1980
- The impact of midtrimester abortion techniques on patients and staffAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1979
- Mid-Trimester Abortion by Dilatation and EvacuationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Effects of legal termination on subsequent pregnancy.BMJ, 1976
- Cervical diameter after suction termination of pregnancy.BMJ, 1976
- A new electronic force monitor to measure factors influencing cervical dilation for vacuum curettageAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1974
- SUBSEQUENT GESTATIONAL MORBIDITY AFTER VARIOUS TYPES OF ABORTIONThe Lancet, 1972
- SECOND-TRIMESTER ABORTION AFTER VAGINAL TERMINATION OF PREGNANCYThe Lancet, 1972