Volunteer Lake Monitoring: Testing the Reliability of Data Collected by the Florida LAKEWATCH Program

Abstract
Because the use of volunteer samplers is a very cost-effective way to collect large amounts of information on lakes over space and time, we studied the reliability of the protocols used by the Florida LAKEWATCH program. We found that chlorophyll extractions with hot ethanol gave values that were no different from those obtained with the standard method of grinding with acetone. In a comparative study of 125 lakes we found the data collected by volunteers were comparable to those collected by professionals. Mean Secchi disk depth, TP, TN, and chlorophyll values obtained by the citizens were strongly correlated (r > 0.99) to the mean values obtained by the professionals. To determine if freezing was a valid means of preserving water samples prior to analysis, we compared estimates of chlorophyll, TP, TN, pH, total alkalinity, and specific conductance obtained from fresh samples with estimates obtained from samples frozen up to 150 days. For most lakes there was little difference in chemical measurements made in samples preserved by freezing for different lengths of time, and various statistical tests indicated that freezing was a valid means of preserving lake water samples prior to analysis. Water quality data produced by volunteer samplers following the LAKEWATCH protocols were just as good as those from samples collected by professional biologists and handled using standard methods of sample preservation. The fact that volunteers can collect credible data means that lake management agencies could amplify their limited budgets by using volunteer monitoring, to sample more lakes and to sample them more frequently.