Evolution, Traits, and the Stages of Human Courtship: Qualifying the Parental Investment Model
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Personality
- Vol. 58 (1) , 97-116
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x
Abstract
Individual differences are explicitly connected to social interaction in Darwin's notion of sexual selection Traits that increase the probability of successful reproduction will tend to increase in frequency This process operates partly through differential choice, by one sex, of certain traits in the other According to the parental investment model, females frequently have more stringent criteria for the traits they will accept in a mate because they have a relatively larger investment in each offspring Because human mating arrangements often involve a substantial commitment of resources by the male, it is necessary to invoke a distinction between the selectivity involved during casual mating opportunities and the selectivity exercised when choosing a long-term partner Ninety-three undergraduate men and women rated their minimum criteria on 24 partner characteristics at four levels of commitment In line with an unqualified parental investment model, females were more selective overall, particularly on status-linked variables In line with a qualified parental investment model, males' trait preferences depended upon the anticipated investment in the relationship Males had lower requirements for a sexual partner than did females, but were nearly as selective as females when considenng requirements for a long-term partnerKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time to integrate sociobiology and social psychologyBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1989
- Dominance and heterosexual attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987
- Dominance and heterosexual attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987
- How strong is the case against contemporary social and personality psychology? A response to Carlson.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- How strong is the case against contemporary social and personality psychology? A response to Carlson.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Preferences in human mate selection.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Why do the Sexes Behave Differently in Close Relationships?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1984
- Social psychology and personality: Toward a convergence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984
- What's social about social psychology? Where's the person in personality research?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984
- Sex differences, androgyny, and approach responses to erotica: A new variation on the old volunteer problem.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980