Monitoring clinical trials with a conditional probability stopping rule
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 11 (5) , 659-672
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780110510
Abstract
Conditional probability procedures offer a flexible means of performing sequential analysis of clinical trials. Since these procedures are not based on repeated significance tests, the number and schedule of the interim analyses is less important than with group sequential procedures. Their main disadvantage is that the magnitude of their effect on the significance level is difficult to assess. This paper describes a conditional probability procedure which attempts to maintain the overall significance level by balancing the probabilities of false early rejection and false early acceptance. Monte Carlo sampling results suggest that this procedure can achieve a large reduction in expected sample size without greatly affecting either the significance level or power of the trial.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring clinical trials: Conditional or predictive power?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Sample sizes required for binomial trials when the true response rates are estimatedJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 1983
- Stochastically curtailed tests in long–term clinical trialsCommunications in Statistics. Part C: Sequential Analysis, 1982
- Predictive Probability Early Termination Plans For Phase II Clinical TrialsBiometrics, 1979
- A Multiple Testing Procedure for Clinical TrialsPublished by JSTOR ,1979
- Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trialsBiometrika, 1977
- A Two-Sample Test for a Linear Hypothesis Whose Power is Independent of the VarianceThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1945