DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND IMAGING STUDIES ARE UNNECESSARY IN MEN WITH UNDETECTABLE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 162 (4) , 1337-1340
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68280-8
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AFTER ANATOMIC RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMYUrologic Clinics of North America, 1997
- Results of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- The Incidence of Prostate Cancer Progression with Undetectable Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in a Series of 394 Radical ProstatectomiesJournal of Urology, 1995
- Long-Term (15 Years) Results After Radical Prostatectomy For Clinically Localized (Stage T2c Or Lower) Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1994
- The Incidence and Significance of Detectable Levels of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen After Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1994
- 5-Year Tumor Recurrence Rates After Anatomical Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy For Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1994
- Recurrent Prostate Cancer Despite Undetectable Prostate Specific AntigenJournal of Urology, 1992
- Prostate Specific Antigen: A Critical Assessment of the Most Useful Tumor Marker for Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1991
- Prostate Specific Antigen: Not Detectable Despite Tumor Progression after Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1989
- Clinical use of Prostate Specific Antigen in Patients with Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1989