Adenosine receptor‐mediated contraction and relaxation of guinea‐pig isolated tracheal smooth muscle: effects of adenosine antagonists
Open Access
- 1 October 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 95 (2) , 371-378
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb11655.x
Abstract
1 The effects of several adenosine analogues and antagonists on guinea-pig isolated trachea have been examined. 2 5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), 5′-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine (MECA) and adenosine (in the presence and absence of dipyridamole) elicited concentration-dependent tracheal relaxation. 3 The R(−)− and S(+)-enantiomers of N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA and S-PIA respectively), N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) and 2-chloroadenosine (CADO) caused contractions at low concentrations (0.05–2.0 μm), whereas at higher concentrations, relaxation resulted. 4 For tracheal relaxation, the adenosine analogues exhibited the following rank order of potency: NECA > CADO > R-PIA = MECA > S-PIA > adenosine. The rank order of potency for inducing contractions was R-PIA > CHA > CADO > S-PIA. These data suggest that relaxation is mediated by adenosine A2-receptors, whereas contraction is the result of activation of A1-receptors. 5 8-Phenyltheophylline (8-PT), aminophylline, the triazoloquinazoline CGS 15943A and NPC205 (1,3-di-n-propyl-8-(4-hydroxyphenyl)xanthine) each inhibited the R-PIA-induced contractile response, whereas enprofylline was without effect. NPC205, aminophylline and 8-PT were competitive antagonists, but CGS15943A was non-competitive. 6 That the most potent antagonist was the A1-selective agent, NPC205 (pA2 = 7.80), further suggests that the contraction is mediated by A1-receptors. Moreover, NPC205 was 13 times more potent as an antagonist of R-PIA-induced contractions (A1) than of NECA-induced relaxations (A2). 7 The antagonists were also found to relax the trachea by an unknown mechanism. That enprofylline did not antagonize the R-PIA-induced contractions, but was 3–4 times more potent a tracheal relaxant than aminophylline, further suggests that a direct effect on airway smooth muscle, rather than antagonism of endogenous adenosine, is more relevant to the bronchodilator effect of alkylxanthines in the treatment of asthma.This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence for A1 and A2 adenosine receptors in guinea pig tracheaLife Sciences, 1987
- Effects of enprofylline and theophylline may show the role of adenosineLife Sciences, 1986
- Dual effect of (−)‐N6‐phenylisopropyl adenosine on guinea‐pig tracheaBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1984
- Inhaled adenosine and guanosine on airway resistance in normal and asthmatic subjects.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1983
- New derivatives of methyl-xanthines: Effect of thiocaffeine thiotheophylline and 8-phenyltheophylline on lipolysis and on phosphodiesterase activitiesPharmacological Research Communications, 1983
- Adenosine receptors: targets for future drugsJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1982
- On the Mechanism of Relaxation of Tracheal Muscle by Theophylline and Other Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase InhibitorsActa Pharmacologica et Toxicologica, 1979
- Alkylxanthines: Inhibition of adenosine-elicited accumulation of cyclic AMP in brain slices and of brain phosphodiesterase activityLife Sciences, 1979
- Pharmacological studies with adenine, adenosine and some phosphorylated derivatives on guinea-pig tracheal muscleJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1976
- Mediation of prostaglandin E2 in the triphasic response to ATP of the isolated tracheal muscle of guinea-pigsJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1976