Structure‐activity relationships of new analogues of arecaidine propargyl ester at muscarinic M1 and M2 receptor subtypes
Open Access
- 1 February 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 96 (2) , 319-324
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1989.tb11820.x
Abstract
1 The potency of arecaidine propargyl ester (APE) and of several analogues containing a modified ester side chain has been assessed at M1 and M2 muscarinic receptor subtypes. APE was shown to act as a potent agonist at ganglionic M1 receptors in the pithed rat, at M2 receptors in guinea-pig isolated atria (-log EC50 = 8.22) and ileum (-log EC50 = 7.77). 2 The arecaidine 2-butynyl and 2-pentynyl esters were approximately equipotent with APE at M1 and M2 receptors, whereas the 2-hexynyl derivative was found to be less potent than APE in atria (-log EC50 = 6.80) and ileum (-log EC50 = 6.70) by about one order of magnitude. The 2-heptynyl and 3-phenyl propargyl esters exhibited no agonist actions in atria and ileum. 3 Shifting the triple bond from the 2 to the 3 position and introducing a bulky group at position 1 of the ester side chain of APE and analogues resulted in competitive antagonists (pA2 ranging from 4.9 to 7.3). 4 APE and its 2-butynyl analogue showed some agonistic selectivity for cardiac M2 receptors (potency ratio, ileum/atria = 2.8 and 4.6 respectively). All antagonists in this series of compounds were not selective in terms of affinity since their pA2 values at cardiac and ileal M2 receptors were similar (potency ratios, ileum/atria = 0.4 to 1.2).This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stimulation of ganglionic muscarinic M1 receptors by a series of tertiary arecaidine and isoarecaidine esters in the pithed ratEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1987
- MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR SUBTYPES: A CRITIQUE OF THE CURRENT CLASSIFICATION AND A PROPOSAL FOR A WORKING NOMENCLATUREJournal of Autonomic Pharmacology, 1986
- Stereoselectivity of muscarinic receptors in vivo and in vitro for oxotremorine analogs. N-[4-tert-amino-2-butynyl]-5-methyl-2-pyrrolidonesJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1985
- The relative potencies of some agonists at M2 muscarinic receptors in guinea‐pig ileum, atria and bronchiBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1985
- A comparison of the antimuscarinic effects of pirenzepine and N-methylatropine on ganglionic and vascular muscarinic receptors in the ratLife Sciences, 1984
- Pharmacological properties of oxotremorine and its analogsLife Sciences, 1983
- Muscarinic receptor subtypes: M1 and M2 biochemical and functional characterizationLife Sciences, 1982
- pA2 and receptor differentiation: A statistical analysis of competitive antagonismLife Sciences, 1979
- CHOLINERGIC AND ANTICHOLINERGIC DRUGS, DO THEY ACT ON COMMON RECEPTORS?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1967
- A molecular basis for drug actionJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1964