Democratization: Economic, cultural and institutional variables
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy
- Vol. 3 (1) , 131-149
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13547869808724639
Abstract
Why and how democratization has taken place in the countries with different levels of economic development and different cultural heritages has attracted interest in comparative politics. From Almond and Lipset in the 1950s to Diamond, O'Donnell and Huntington in the 1990s, the field was filled with theoretical arguments and empirical findings. Applying the Schumpeterian ‘democratic method’ to look at these ideas and data, I try to answer the ‘why and how’ from the western as well as eastern perspectives and to find out the strengths and weaknesses of the economic, cultural and institutional paradigms. The impact of economic growth on democratization is my central focus. My conclusion is that economic growth does not lead to democratization but contributes to its consolidation. I also dispute the arguments of ‘Asian values’ and Asian democracy.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modernization: Theories and FactsWorld Politics, 1997
- Democratization in Southeast and East AsiaPublished by ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute ,1997
- Democratizing Oriental DespotismPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- II American Democracy in Relation to AsiaPublished by ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute ,1993
- Politics in Developing CountriesPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1990
- Democracy in Developing CountriesPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1988
- The Politics of AccommodationPublished by University of California Press ,1968
- 12. Conclusion: Comparative Political CulturePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1965
- The Civic CulturePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1963
- Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political LegitimacyAmerican Political Science Review, 1959