'Cookbook' Medicine
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 150 (3) , 496-500
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1990.00390150010002
Abstract
Traditionally, individual physicians have enjoyed a great deal of professional autonomy in practicing the art of medicine, largely free of external restraint on decisions concerning what course of medical action is most appropriate for a particular patient. Lately, however, there has developed a strong push toward the formal creation, dissemination, and enforcement of explicit clinical standards relating to the quality and efficacy of various medical interventions, standards that would guide the decisions and actions of medical practitioners. This push for formal, explicit clinical standards emanates from a variety of sources for many purposes. Third parties, both public1 (Wall Street Journal. September 8,1989:B2) and private, 2 that pay for health care want to assure that the care they purchase on behalf of their beneficiaries is appropriate and efficacious. Physicians, institutional administrators, and other health care providers have a professional and ethical stake in assuring the quality of care. Clinical standardsThis publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The State of Outcome Research: Are We on Target?New England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- The Need for Clinical Standards of CareQRB - Quality Review Bulletin, 1988
- Defining Quality in Medical CareHealth Affairs, 1988
- Law, medicine, and the terminally ill: Humanizing the approach to risk managementHealth Care Management Review, 1987
- Reexamining the Principles of MedicineHealth Affairs, 1987
- Medical Uncertainty, Diagnostic Testing, and Legal LiabilityLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1985