Efficacy of Postoperative Epidural Analgesia
Top Cited Papers
- 12 November 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 290 (18) , 2455-2463
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.18.2455
Abstract
Review from JAMA — Efficacy of Postoperative Epidural Analgesia — A Meta-analysis — ContextWhether epidural analgesia is a better method than parenteral opioids for postoperative pain control remains controversial.ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia vs parenteral opioids, the primary alternative technique.Data SourcesStudies were identified primarily by searching the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database (1966 to April 25, 2002) and other sources for studies related to postoperative epidural analgesia.Study SelectionInclusion criteria were a comparison of epidural therapy vs parenteral opioids for postoperative analgesia, measurement of pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) or numeric rating scale, randomization of patients to either therapy, and adult patients (≥18 years). A total of 1404 abstracts were identified, 100 of which met all inclusion criteria.Data ExtractionEach article was reviewed and data extracted from tables, text, or extrapolated from figures as needed. Weighted mean pain scores, weighted mean differences in pain score, and weighted incidences of complications were determined by using a fixed-effect model.Data SynthesisEpidural analgesia provided better postoperative analgesia compared with parenteral opioids (mean [SE], 19.40 mm [0.17] vs 29.40 mm [0.20] on the VAS; P<.001). When analyzed by postoperative day, epidural analgesia was better than parenteral opioids on each postoperative day (P<.001 for each day after surgery). For all types of surgery and pain assessments, all forms of epidural analgesia provided significantly better postoperative analgesia compared with parenteral opioid analgesia (P<.001 for all), with the exception of thoracic epidural analgesia vs opioids for rest pain after thoracic surgery (weighted mean difference, 0.6 mm; 95% confidence interval, –0.3 to 1.5 mm; P = .12). The complication rates were lower than expected for nausea or vomiting and pruritus but comparable with existing data for lower extremity motor block.ConclusionEpidural analgesia, regardless of analgesic agent, location of catheter placement, and type and time of pain assessment, provided better postoperative analgesia compared with parenteral opioids.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidural Analgesia Enhances Functional Exercise Capacity and Health-Related Quality of Life After Colonic Surgery: Results of a Randomized TrialSurvey of Anesthesiology, 2003
- Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trialPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- The development of national guidelines for pain control: synopsis and commentaryEuropean journal of pain, 2001
- Epidural analgesia compared with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia: Postoperative outcome measures after mastectomy with immediate TRAM flap breast reconstructionRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2001
- Acute pain management: analysis, implications and consequences after prospective experience with 6349 surgical patientsEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2000
- A comparison of thoracic and lumbar epidural techniques for post-thoracoabdominal esophagectomy analgesiaCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1999
- Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testBMJ, 1997
- Effects of Perioperative Analgesic Technique on Rate of Recovery after Colon SurgeryAnesthesiology, 1995
- Synergistic Antinociceptive Interaction after Epidural Coadministration of Morphine and Lidocaine in RatsAnesthesiology, 1994
- Meta-analysis: a review.Psychosomatic Medicine, 1991