Clinical Use of Bone Densitometry
- 18 April 1991
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 324 (16) , 1105-1109
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199104183241606
Abstract
IF measurements of bone mass are to be clinically useful, they must be safe, precise, accurate, and of reasonable cost in relation to the information provided. Since when bone mass is low the clinical outcome of concern is fracture, there must be a demonstrated relation between the measurement and the subsequent risk of fracture. The information provided must be helpful to the clinician in making a decision to intervene or not; and if a therapeutic regimen is chosen, it must have a positive influence on health (e.g., a reduction in the incidence of fractures) without an unreasonable increase in other . . .Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Greek Tyrants and the Persians, 546–479 B.C.The Classical Quarterly, 1990
- The contribution of bone loss to postmenopausal osteoporosisOsteoporosis International, 1990
- Effect of Intermittent Cyclical Etidronate Therapy on Bone Mass and Fracture Rate in Women with Postmenopausal OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- What do physicians in practice do to prevent osteoporosis?Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1990
- Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research GroupJAMA, 1990
- Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1988
- Hip Fracture and the Use of Estrogens in Postmenopausal WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Steroid-Induced Fractures and Bone Loss in Patients with AsthmaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Decreased Risk of Fractures of the Hip and Lower Forearm with Postmenopausal Use of EstrogenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Primary HyperparathyroidismNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980