A New Model of Medical Decisions: Exploring the Limits of Shared Decision Making
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 23 (4) , 275-280
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x03256006
Abstract
This article proposes a model of medical decisions based on 2 fundamental characteristics of each decision—importance and certainty. Importance reflects a combination of objective and subjective factors; certainty is present if 1 intervention is superior and absent if 2 or more interventions are approximately equal. The proposed model uses these characteristics to predict who will have decisional priority for any given decision and shows how one class of decisions lends itself particularly well to shared decision making. Three other types of decisions are less well suited to a collaborative decision: 1) For major choices that have low certainty, patients should be encouraged to be the primary decision makers, with physician assistance as needed. 2) Most minor decisions that have high certainty are expected to be made by physicians. 3) Major decisions that have high certainty are likely to cause serious conflict when patients and physicians disagree.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Informed Decision Making in Outpatient PracticeJAMA, 1999
- Systemic methotrexate therapy versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in tubal pregnancy. Part II. Patient preferences for systemic methotrexateFertility and Sterility, 1998
- Physician Recommendations and Patient Autonomy: Finding a Balance between Physician Power and Patient ChoiceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- What Role Do Patients Wish to Play in Treatment Decision Making?Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- Asking the Courts to Set the Standard of Emergency Care -- The Case of Baby KNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Clinical reasoning in medicine and nursing: Decision making versus problem solvingTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 1992
- Overconfidence among physicians and nurses: The ‘micro-certainty, macro-uncertainty’ phenomenonSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Physicians’ Reasons for Not Entering Eligible Patients in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgery for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- The Toss-upNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981