Is Postmortem Examination Useful in Pediatric Oncology?
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Pediatric Pathology
- Vol. 13 (6) , 709-715
- https://doi.org/10.3109/15513819309048257
Abstract
Clinicians are often reluctant to request an autopsy for patients who have been extensively investigated during life, because they may believe that little additional information will be obtained. To examine whether this is the case, the autopsy records of pediatric oncology patients at the Adelaide Children's Hospital were reviewed. A total of 63 oncology patients died in the hospital during the period 1982–1991, 28 of whom underwent postmortem examination. Class I findings (those that would have altered management if they had been known during life) were found in 7 cases (25%). Major pathological findings that would not have altered management (class II) were found in 14.3% of cases. The most common class I findings were fungal infections with organisms such as Aspergillus or Candida species. Postmortem examination also revealed treatment-related complications in five patients, and in one case the diagnosis was made only at autopsy. This study confirms that postmortem examination can provide valuable new information even for patients who had been widely investigated in life and in whom the cause of death may appear obvious.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The autopsy: A dying art? A paediatric perspectiveJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1990
- Death certification: increased clinical confidence in diagnosis and lack of interest in confirmation by necropsy is not justified.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1989
- To redeem them from death. Reactions of family members to autopsyThe American Journal of Medicine, 1986
- The Autopsy as a Measure of Accuracy of the Death CertificateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Clinical diagnosis: a post-mortem assessment of accuracy in the 1980s.Published by BMJ ,1985
- Autopsy: moribund art or vital science?The American Journal of Medicine, 1985
- The Value of the Autopsy in Three Medical ErasNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- AutopsyScientific American, 1983
- Necropsy: a yardstick for clinical diagnoses.BMJ, 1980
- The Autopsy: Its Decline and a Suggestion for Its RevivalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978