The rhetoric of nukespeak
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 56 (3) , 253-272
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390263
Abstract
Nukespeak is the use of metaphor, euphemism, technical jargon and acronyms to portray nuclear concepts in a “neutral”; or positive way. This essay identifies two nukespeak strategies, domestication and bureaucratization. Nukespeak functions as a potentially dangerous “terministic screen”; for both speakers and audience: The moral and practical implications of nuclear war are ignored or underestimated by nukespeak users, and nuclear policy issues are rendered trivial or less accessible to the general public. Two cases of nukespeak strategy by President Ronald Reagan are examined as illustrations of the implications of nukespeak for the audience: the term “CORRTEX”; as an instance of bureaucratization and the use of domesticated metaphors to describe the purpose of the “Strategic Defense Initiative.”Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense IntellectualsSigns: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1987
- Ronald Reagan's “star wars” address: Mythic containment of technical reasoningQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1986
- Ronald Reagan's re‐formulation of the rhetoric of war: Analysis of the “zero option,” “evil empire,” and “star wars” addressesQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1986
- The Polls: ABM and Star Wars: Attitudes Toward Nuclear Defense, 1945-1985Public Opinion Quarterly, 1986
- Making Nuclear Weapons Easier to Live WithBulletin of Peace Proposals, 1985
- The third persona: An ideological turn in rhetorical theoryCentral States Speech Journal, 1984
- The ideological turn in modern criticismCentral States Speech Journal, 1983
- The experience of anxiety: A phenomenological investigationQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1980
- Victory Is PossibleForeign Policy, 1980
- Thepersonaeof scientific discourseQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1975