Analgesic efficacy and safety of tramadol enantiomers in comparison with the racemate: a randomised, double-blind study with gynaecological patients using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pain
- Vol. 62 (3) , 313-320
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)00274-i
Abstract
The opioid analgesic tramadol is a racemate and consists of 50% (+)- and 50% (-)-enantiomer. This study investigated analgesic efficacy and safety of both enantiomers after intravenous (i.v.) injection in comparison with the racemate. Ninety-eight patients recovering from major gynaecological surgery under opioid-free halothane anaesthesia were treated in a randomised, double-blind study with (+)-tramadol, (-)-tramadol or the racemate. Following an individualised i.v. loading dose up to a maximum of 200 mg, patient-controlled analgesia with demand doses of 20 mg was made available for 24 h. The primary criterion was of efficacy was the decrease of pain intensity on a 5-point verbal rating scale from severe or maximum pain to mild or no pain intensity on a 5-point verbal rating scale from severe or maximum pain to mild or no pain within the first hour after the loading dose. The secondary criterion was patient satisfaction with pain relief during the 24-h observation period stated in the final interview. Patients who terminated the study prematurely were evaluated as non-responders. Of patients treated with (+)-tramadol, tramadol racemate, and (-)-tramadol, 12%, 15%, and 53% of treated patients, respectively, terminated the study prematurely because of inefficacy. Of patients treated with (+)-tramadol, racemate or (-)-tramadol 67%, 48% and 38%, respectively, were considered responders regarding the primary criterion of efficacy (P = 0.061), and 82%, 76%, or 41% with respect to the secondary criterion (P = 0.001). Assessment of laboratory screening, adverse events, vital signs and blood gas monitoring showed no serious drug-related events. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently reported non-serious side effects and were most often seen with (+)-tramadol. Taking into account both efficacy and safety aspects, the racemate seems to be superior to either enantiomer alone.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tramadol for the Management of Acute PainDrugs, 1994
- TramadolDrugs, 1993
- Characterization of the unusual antinociceptive profile of tramadol in miceDrug Development Research, 1993
- Efficacy and Safety of Tramadol Versus Morphine for Moderate and Severe Postoperative Pain With Special Regard to Respiratory DepressionAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1992
- Tramadol: pain relief by an opioid without depression of respirationAnaesthesia, 1992
- Interaction of the central analgesic, tramadol, with the uptake and release of 5‐hydroxytryptamine in the rat brain in vitroBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1992
- Abuse potential and pharmacological comparison of tramadol and morphineDrug and Alcohol Dependence, 1991
- Postoperative Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Tramadol: Analgesic Efficacy and Minimum Effective ConcentrationsThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 1990
- The 1988 Merck Frosst Award.: The role of ascending and descending noradrenergic and serotonergic pathways in opioid and non-opioid antinociception as revealed by lesion studiesCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 1989