Euclidean distance matrix analysis: Confidence intervals for form and growth differences
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Vol. 98 (1) , 73-86
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330980107
Abstract
Analysis of biological forms using landmark data has received substantial attention recently. Much of the statistical work in this area has concentrated on the estimation of average form, average form difference, and average growth difference. From the statistical, as well as the scientific point of view, it is important that any estimate of a scientifically relevant quantity be accompanied by a statement regarding its accuracy. Such a statement is contained in a confidence interval. The purpose of this paper is to provide a method to obtain confidence intervals for form difference and growth difference estimators. The estimators are based on Euclidean distance matrix analysis. The confidence intervals are calculated using the model independent bootstrap method. We illustrate the method by using three examples: morphological differences between samples of craniofacial patients and normal controls using two dimensional data from head X‐rays, sexual dimorphism of craniofacial morphology inCebus apella, and sexual dimorphism of facial growth inCebus apellausing three‐dimensional data. © Wiley‐Liss, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Euclidean Distance Matrix Analysis (EDMA): Estimation of mean form and mean form differenceMathematical Geology, 1993
- On comparing biological shapes: Detection of influential landmarksAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1992
- Some comments on coordinate‐free and scale‐invariant methods in morphometricsAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1991
- MorphometricsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1990
- Statistical Models in Morphometrics: Are They Realistic?Systematic Zoology, 1990
- Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformationsPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,1989
- Comparative study of normal, Crouzon, and Apert craniofacial morphology using finite element scaling analysisAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1987
- Size and Shape Spaces for Landmark Data in Two DimensionsStatistical Science, 1986
- Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical AccuracyStatistical Science, 1986
- The 1972 Wald Lecture Robust Statistics: A ReviewThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1972