Self-compensation in semiconductors
- 15 September 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review B
- Vol. 60 (11) , 8138-8146
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.60.8138
Abstract
The problem of self-compensation of charged dopants is analyzed. Special emphasis is given to dopants in binary oxides. It is shown that one can determine the degree of self-compensation from the properties of the host material and dopant concentration alone. It is further shown that for a native p-type semiconductor, donors are compensated, mostly, by native ionic defects. On the other hand, doping with acceptors allows us to increase significantly the hole concentration, i.e., self-compensation is low under high doping levels. For a native n-type semiconductor the opposite is true, namely, extrinsic acceptors are mainly compensated by native ionic defects. It is shown that the changes in concentration of all the charged defects are simply related by a single factor, the doping factor f, or its power where k depends solely on the defect’s charge. Quantitative calculations of f and defect concentrations are presented for which was used as a model material. It is found that for p-type doping with donors results in f within the range of depending on the dopant concentration and This means that the hole concentration decreases and the electron concentration increases at most by a factor of 10. Therefore one does not expect to obtain a changeover from p- to n-type cuprous oxide by doping, under equilibrium conditions. Most of the donors are compensated by negative ionic defects. Self-compensation in the presence of amphoteric defects and Fermi level stabilization are discussed, using the former formalism.
Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fundamental doping limits in wide gap II–VI compoundsJournal of Crystal Growth, 1996
- Defect chemistry of Cu2−yO at elevated temperatures. Part II: Electrical conductivity, thermoelectric power and charged point defectsSolid State Ionics, 1995
- Doping limitations in wide gap II–VI compounds by Fermi level pinningJournal of Crystal Growth, 1995
- Defect chemistry of Cu2−yO at elevated temperatures. Part I: Non-stoichiometry, phase width and dominant point defectsSolid State Ionics, 1994
- Defect Chemistry: Composition, Transport, and Reactions in the Solid State; Part I: ThermodynamicsAngewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 1993
- Theory of relative native- and impurity-defect abundances in compound semiconductors and the factors that influence themPhysical Review B, 1989
- Binding and formation energies of native defect pairs in GaAsPhysical Review B, 1986
- Are impurities the cause of ’’self’’-compensation in large-band-gap semiconductors?Journal of Applied Physics, 1980
- Calculation of distribution equilibrium of amphoteric silicon in gallium arsenideJournal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 1972
- Self-Compensation Limited Conductivity in Binary Semiconductors. I. TheoryPhysical Review B, 1964