Region Does Not Mean “Race”—Reality Versus Convention in Forensic Anthropology
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- Published by ASTM International in Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Vol. 40 (2) , 171-175
- https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs15336j
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Objective View of RaceNAPA Bulletin, 2008
- Modern human origins and the dynamics of regional continuityPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1995
- Clines and clusters versus “Race:” a test in ancient Egypt and the case of a death on the NileAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1993
- Forensic anthropology and the concept of race: If races don't exist, why are forensic anthropologists so good at identifying them?Social Science & Medicine, 1992
- A nonracial craniofacial perspective on human variation: A(ustralia) to Z(uni)American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1990
- The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programmeProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1979
- On the Non-Existence of Human RacesCurrent Anthropology, 1962
- American Catholic Opinion in the Slavery ControversyPublished by Columbia University Press ,1944
- Pope Paul III and the American IndiansHarvard Theological Review, 1937