Therapeutic methods repeatability of response to hypertonic saline aerosol in children with mild to severe asthma
- 1 November 1994
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Pediatric Pulmonology
- Vol. 18 (5) , 330-336
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.1950180511
Abstract
Non‐isotonic aerosols are being used more commonly to perform bronchial provocation tests. In contrast to histamine and methacholine challenge tests they appear to have higher specificity and a higher predictive value. The aim of the present study was to assess the reproducibility of the response to challenge with 4.5% hypertonic saline administered via an ultrasonic nebulizer in children with mild to severe asthma.Seventeen children with asthma aged 10 to 14 years completed two or three challenge tests at the same time of day within a 10 day period. Of these 17 children 9 had mild, 4 moderate, and 4 severe asthma. Children inhaled 4.5% hypertonic NaCl from an ultrasonic nebulizer with an output of 1.9 to 2.5 mL/min (Timeter) using the protocol developed by Anderson with modifications. A fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline of 15% or more was considered a positive response and PD15, was calculated.In 16/17 subjects a greater than 15% fall in FEV1 occurred consistently on all study days. One subject with moderate asthma had a less than 15% fall in FEV1 on both study days. The coefficient of repeatability for PD15 was 1.8. This equals 0.85 of a doubling dose difference between the two or three measurements of PD15. The cumulative time of aerosol inhalation causing a fall in FEV1 2 15%) (PT15) showed a coefficient of repeatability of 1.59, similar to 0.67 doubling dose difference. The PD15 and PT15 were highly significantly correlated. The 4.5% NaCl challenge test yields good reproducibility in children with mild to severe asthma under laboratory conditions.Pediatr Pulmonol. 1994;18:330–336 © Wiley‐Liss, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of airway responsiveness to methacholine: relative importance of the precision of drug delivery and the method of assessing response.Thorax, 1993
- Statistics in respiratory medicine. 2. Repeatability and method comparison.Thorax, 1991
- Hypertonic saline increases vascular permeability in the rat trachea by producing neurogenic inflammation.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1990
- Inhalation of hypertonic saline as a bronchial challenge in children with mild asthma and normal childrenJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1989
- Estimation and repeatability of the response to inhaled histamine in a community survey.Thorax, 1987
- Hyperosmolarity as the stimulus to asthma induced by hyperventilation?Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1986
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Comparison of cold air, ultrasonic mist, and methacholine inhalations as tests of bronchial reactivity in normal and asthmatic childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1985
- Bronchial hyperreactivity in response to inhalation of ultrasonically nebulised solutions of distilled water and saline.BMJ, 1981
- Reproducibility and comparison of responses to inhaled histamine and methacholine.Thorax, 1978