Tempered Realism about the Force of Selection
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 58 (4) , 553-573
- https://doi.org/10.1086/289640
Abstract
Darwinians are realists about the force of selection, but there has been surprisingly little discussion about what form this realism should take. Arguments about the units of selection in general and genic selectionism in particular reveal two realist assumptions: (1) for any selection process, there is a uniquely correct identification of the operative selective forces and the level at which each impinges; and (2) selective forces must satisfy the Pareto-style requirement of probabilistic causation. I argue that both assumptions are false; we must temper realism about the force of selection and revise the way we think about probabilistic causation.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Structural Approach to Defining Units of SelectionPhilosophy of Science, 1989
- The Return of the GeneThe Journal of Philosophy, 1988
- Reply to Rosenberg on Genic SelectionismPhilosophy of Science, 1983
- Coefficients, Effects, and Genic SelectionPhilosophy of Science, 1983
- Probabilistic Causality and the Question of TransitivityPhilosophy of Science, 1983
- Artifact, Cause and Genic SelectionPhilosophy of Science, 1982
- Frequency-Dependent CausationThe Journal of Philosophy, 1982
- A critique of Suppes' theory of probabilistic causalitySynthese, 1981
- Causal Laws and Effective StrategiesNoûs, 1979
- In Defense of a Probabilistic Theory of CausalityPhilosophy of Science, 1978