Effects of Multisite Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Intraventricular Conduction Delay
Top Cited Papers
- 22 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 344 (12) , 873-880
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200103223441202
Abstract
One third of patients with chronic heart failure have electrocardiographic evidence of a major intraventricular conduction delay, which may worsen left ventricular systolic dysfunction through asynchronous ventricular contraction. Uncontrolled studies suggest that multisite biventricular pacing improves hemodynamics and well-being by reducing ventricular asynchrony. We assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of this new therapy. Sixty-seven patients with severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III) due to chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, with normal sinus rhythm and a duration of the QRS interval of more than 150 msec, received transvenous atriobiventricular pacemakers (with leads in one atrium and each ventricle). This single-blind, randomized, controlled crossover study compared the responses of the patients during two periods: a three-month period of inactive pacing (ventricular inhibited pacing at a basic rate of 40 bpm) and a three-month period of active (atriobiventricular) pacing. The primary end point was the distance walked in six minutes; the secondary end points were the quality of life as measured by questionnaire, peak oxygen consumption, hospitalizations related to heart failure, the patients' treatment preference (active vs. inactive pacing), and the mortality rate. Nine patients were withdrawn from the study before randomization, and 10 failed to complete both study periods. Thus, 48 patients completed both phases of the study. The mean (±SD) distance walked in six minutes was 23 percent greater with active pacing (399±100 m vs. 326±134 m, P<0.001), the quality-of-life score improved by 32 percent (P<0.001), peak oxygen uptake increased by 8 percent (P<0.03), hospitalizations were decreased by two thirds (P<0.05), and active pacing was preferred by 85 percent of the patients (P<0.001). Although it is technically complex, atriobiventricular pacing significantly improves exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised trial—the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE IIThe Lancet, 2000
- Long-term ACE-inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure or left-ventricular dysfunction: a systematic overview of data from individual patientsThe Lancet, 2000
- β-Adrenergic Receptor Blockade in Chronic Heart FailureCirculation, 2000
- The Effect of Spironolactone on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Severe Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Implantable Left Ventricular Assist DevicesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Successes and failures of current treatment of heart failureThe Lancet, 1998
- Cardiovascular Medicine at the Turn of the Millennium: Triumphs, Concerns, and OpportunitiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Improving survival for patients with advanced heart failure: A study of 737 consecutive patientsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Four Chamber Pacing in Dilated CardiomyopathyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1994
- Effects of Enalapril on Mortality in Severe Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987