An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever
Open Access
- 27 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 2 (6) , e542
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000542
Abstract
To assess the efficacy of gatifloxacin versus cefixime in the treatment of uncomplicated culture positive enteric fever. A randomized, open-label, active control trial with two parallel arms. Emergency Room and Outpatient Clinics in Patan Hospital, Lagankhel, Lalitpur, Nepal. Patients with clinically diagnosed uncomplicated enteric fever meeting the inclusion criteria. Patients were allocated to receive one of two drugs, Gatifloxacin or Cefixime. The dosages used were Gatifloxacin 10 mg/kg, given once daily for 7 days, or Cefixime 20 mg/kg/day given in two divided doses for 7 days. The primary outcome measure was fever clearance time. The secondary outcome measure was overall treatment failure (acute treatment failure and relapse). Randomization was carried out in 390 patients before enrollment was suspended on the advice of the independent data safety monitoring board due to significant differences in both primary and secondary outcome measures in the two arms and the attainment of a priori defined endpoints. Median (95% confidence interval) fever clearance times were 92 hours (84–114 hours) for gatifloxacin recipients and 138 hours (105–164 hours) for cefixime-treated patients (Hazard Ratio[95%CI] = 2.171 [1.545–3.051], p<0.0001). 19 out of 70 (27%) patients who completed the 7 day trial had acute clinical failure in the cefixime group as compared to 1 out of 88 patients (1%) in gatifloxacin group(Odds Ratio [95%CI] = 0.031 [0.004 – 0.237], p<0.001). Overall treatment failure patients (relapsed patients plus acute treatment failure patients plus death) numbered 29. They were determined to be (95% confidence interval) 37.6 % (27.14%–50.2%) in the cefixime group and 3.5% (2.2%–11.5%) in the gatifloxacin group (HR[95%CI] = 0.084 [0.025–0.280], p<0.0001). There was one death in the cefixime group. Based on this study, gatifloxacin is a better treatment for uncomplicated enteric fever as compared to cefixime. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN75784880Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Salmonella enterica Serovar Paratyphi A and S. enterica Serovar Typhi Cause Indistinguishable Clinical Syndromes in Kathmandu, NepalClinical Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Decreased susceptibility to fluoroquinolones and gyrA gene mutation in the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and Paratyphi A isolated in Katmandu, Nepal, in 2003Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 2006
- Outpatient Gatifloxacin Therapy and Dysglycemia in Older AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Tissue Penetration of Cefpodoxime and Cefixime in Healthy SubjectsThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2005
- Fluoroquinolones for treating typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever)Published by Wiley ,2005
- Gatifloxacin Therapy Associated with HypoglycemiaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Pharmacokinetics of Gatifloxacin in Infants and ChildrenAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2005
- “Preliminary Report on the Beneficial Effect of Chloromycetin in the Treatment of Typhoid Fever”—A CommentaryWilderness & Environmental Medicine, 2004
- Mechanism of Therapeutic Effectiveness of Cefixime against Typhoid FeverAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2001
- A comparative study of ofloxacin and cefixime for treatment of typhoid fever in childrenThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1999