The Ambiguity of Clinical Intentions

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Medical ethicists place great weight on the intentions of clinical actions. The religious principle of “double effect,” based on a distinction between intentions and consequences, is an ethical cornerstone in the medical treatment of the terminally ill1,2. Giving high doses of narcotic analgesics to a dying patient to relieve pain and suffering is considered ethical even if it inadvertently hastens death, provided the clinician did not intend to help the patient die. Death may even be foreseen as a side effect of the intervention as long as it is not intended. On the other hand, should a clinician . . .

This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit: