Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Environmental determinants?
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in The Behavior Analyst
- Vol. 22 (2) , 93-97
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03391985
Abstract
Use of inferential statistics should be based on the experimental question, the nature of the design, and the nature of the data. A hallmark of single-subject designs is that such statistics should not be required to determine whether the data answer the experimental question. Yet inferential statistics are being included more often in papers that purport to present data relevant to the behavior of individual organisms. The reasons for this too often seem to be extrinsic to the experimental analysis of behavior. They include lapses in experimental design and social pressure from colleagues who are unfamiliar with single-subject research. Regardless of whether inferential statistics are used, behavior analysts need to be sophisticated about experimental design and inferential statistics. Such sophistication not only will enhance design and analysis of behavioral experiments, but also will make behavior analysts more persuasive in presenting rationales for the use or nonuse of inferential statistics to the larger scientific community.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Some things significance testing does and does not doThe Behavior Analyst, 1999
- Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Experimental control is betterThe Behavior Analyst, 1999
- Visual Inspection of Data Revisited: Do the Eyes Still Have It?The Behavior Analyst, 1998
- A Critique of the Usefulness of Inferential Statistics in Applied Behavior AnalysisThe Behavior Analyst, 1998
- Needed: A Ban on the Significance TestPsychological Science, 1997
- Psychology Will Be a Much Better Science When We Change the Way We Analyze DataCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 1996
- A case history in scientific method.American Psychologist, 1956
- Are theories of learning necessary?Psychological Review, 1950