Process and Agency in Early State Formation
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Cambridge Archaeological Journal
- Vol. 9 (1) , 3-21
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959774300015183
Abstract
Most pristine states formed in the context of competing chiefdoms, when one of the latter succeeded in incorporating its rivals into a larger polity. Some of the processes evident during state formation include chiefly cycling, biased transmission, territorial expansion, and the gaining of competitive advantage. In some archaeological circles, however, it has become fashionable to reject ecological, demographic, and technological processes, and seek agent-based or ideological explanations for state formation. This essay, delivered as the tenth McDonald Lecture, examines five agents who modified ideologies and created states from chiefdoms. It concludes that process and agency are complementary, rather than antithetical, perspectives; thus the latter is unlikely to make the former obsolete.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Huitzilopochtli's Conquest: Aztec Ideology in the Archaeological RecordCambridge Archaeological Journal, 1998
- A Mathematical Model of Primary State FormationCultural Dynamics, 1998
- On the Perils of "Politically Correct" ArchaeologyCurrent Anthropology, 1994
- The culture history of MadagascarJournal of World Prehistory, 1993
- Theory in Anthropology since the SixtiesComparative Studies in Society and History, 1984
- Aztec State Making: Ecology, Structure, and the Origin of the StateAmerican Anthropologist, 1983
- Population, Exchange, and Early State Formation in Southwestern IranAmerican Anthropologist, 1975
- The Cultural Evolution of CivilizationsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1972
- The “Hawaiian Cultural Revolution”: Some Political and Economic ConsiderationsAmerican Anthropologist, 1969
- The Rise of a Zulu EmpireScientific American, 1960