Translocation breakpoints inFHIT and FRA3B in both homologs of chromosome 3 in an esophageal adenocarcinoma
- 11 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer
- Vol. 30 (3) , 292-298
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::aid-gcc1095>3.0.co;2-f
Abstract
Common fragile sites have been proposed to play a mechanistic role in chromosome translocations and other rearrangements in cancer cells in vivo based on their behavior in vitro and their co‐localization with cancer translocation breakpoints. This hypothesis has been the subject of controversy, because associations have been made at the chromosomal level and because of the large number of both fragile sites and cancer chromosome breakpoints. Tests of this hypothesis at the molecular level are now possible with the cloning of common fragile site loci and the use of fragile site clones in the analysis of rearranged chromosomes. FRA3B, the most frequently seen common fragile site, lies within the large FHIT gene. It is now well established that this region is the site of frequent, large intragenic deletions and aberrant transcripts in a number of tumors and tumor cell lines. In contrast, only one tumor‐associated translocation involving the FHIT gene has been reported. We have found translocations in both homologs of chromosome 3 in an early‐passage esophageal adenocarcinoma cell line. This cell line showed no normal FHIT transcripts by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Subsequent chromosome analysis showed translocations of the short arms of both homologs of chromosome 3: t(3;16) and t(3;4). The breakpoints of both translocations were shown by fluorescence in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction to be in the FHIT gene, at or near the center of the fragile site region. Using rapid amplification of cDNA ends with FHIT primers, a noncoding chimeric transcript resulting from t(3;16) was identified. These data provide direct support for the hypothesis that FRA3B, and likely other common fragile sites, may be “hot spots” for translocations in certain cancers, as they are for deletions, and that such translocations have the potential to form abnormal chimeric transcripts. In addition, the results suggest selection for loss of a functional FHIT gene by the translocation events.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The canine copper toxicosis locus is not syntenic with ATP7B or ATX1 and maps to a region showing homology to human 2p21Mammalian Genome, 1999
- Frequent deletions within FRA7G at 7q31.2 in invasive epithelial ovarian cancerGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 1999
- Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United StatesCancer, 1998
- The hereditary renal cell carcinoma 3;8 translocation fuses FHIT to a patched- related gene, TRC8Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1998
- Instability at Chromosomal Fragile SitesPublished by Springer Nature ,1998
- Expression of Fragile Sites Triggers Intrachromosomal Mammalian Gene Amplification and Sets Boundaries to Early AmpliconsCell, 1997
- Sensitivity and selectivity of the DNA damage sensor responsible for activating p53-dependent G1 arrest.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1996
- Cancer chromosome breakpoints and common fragile sites induced by aphidicolinCancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, 1984
- DNA polymerase ? inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomesHuman Genetics, 1984
- Hereditary Renal-Cell Carcinoma Associated with a Chromosomal TranslocationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979