Reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Western Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 175 (4) , 240-244
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ewjm.175.4.240-a
Abstract
To test the reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments by emergency medicine physicians. Prospective observational study; 2 examiners each recorded various pelvic examination findings on 186 patients. A private university hospital and a public county hospital staffed by attending emergency medicine physicians who share an emergency medicine residency program. Senior resident (3rd or 4th year) and attending emergency physicians. Percentage of agreement and percentage of positive agreement for cervical motion tenderness, uterine tenderness, adnexal tenderness, adnexal mass, and uterine size (within 2 cm). The agreement ranged between 71% and 84%, but the percentage of positive agreement was much lower, ranging from 17% to 33%. Agreement for uterine size, within 2 cm, was 60%. The findings of bimanual pelvic examinations performed by emergency physicians in an emergency department have poor interexaminer reliability.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accuracy of the pelvic examination in detecting adnexal massesPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2000
- Predictive Value of History and Physical Examination in Patients With Suspected Ectopic PregnancyAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1999
- Reliability of diagnostic tests.1997
- How accurate is the pelvic examination as compared to transvaginal sonography? A prospective, comparative study.1994
- Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.BMJ, 1992
- A prospective comparison of clinical ultrasound and operative examination of the female pelvis.Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 1988
- ULTRASOUND AND THE PELVIC MASS1983
- The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical DataPublished by JSTOR ,1977
- The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and JudgmentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975
- The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and JudgmentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975