Naïve bats discriminate arctiid moth warning sounds but generalize their aposematic meaning
Open Access
- 15 July 2009
- journal article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Experimental Biology
- Vol. 212 (14) , 2141-2148
- https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.029991
Abstract
SUMMARY Naïve red (Lasiurus borealis Müller) and big brown(Eptesicus fuscus Beauvois) bats quickly learn to avoid noxious sound-producing tiger moths. After this experience with a model tiger moth,bats generalize the meaning of these prey-generated sounds to a second tiger moth species producing a different call. Here we describe the three-dimensional kinematic and bioacoustic details of this behaviour, first,as naïve bats learn to deal with an unpalatable model tiger moth and subsequently, as they avoid acoustic mimics. The tiger moths' first clicks influenced the bats' echolocation behaviour and the percentage of interactions that included terminal buzzes was associated with capture and investigatory behaviour. When the mimic was introduced, the bats decreased both their minimum distance to the tiger moth and the time at which they broke off their attack compared with their exposure to the model on the night before. These kinematic signatures closely match the bats' behaviour on their first night of experience with the model. Minimum distances and time of pursuit cessation increased again by the last night of the mimic's presentation. These kinematic and bioacoustic results show that although naïve bats generalize the meaning of aposematic tiger moth calls, they discriminate the prey-generated signals as different and investigate. Extrapolating to experienced bats, these results suggest that acoustic predators probably exert potent and fine-scaled selective forces on acoustic mimicry complexes.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systemsBioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008
- Acoustic mimicry in a predator–prey interactionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Rapid jamming avoidance in biosonarProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Tiger moth responses to a simulated bat attack: timing and duty cycleJournal of Experimental Biology, 2006
- Can two streams of auditory information be processed simultaneously? Evidence from the gleaning bat Antrozous pallidusJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 2003
- ‘Un chant d’appel amoureux’: acoustic communication in mothsJournal of Experimental Biology, 1999
- Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple TestingJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1995
- An investigation on the accuracy of three-dimensional space reconstruction using the direct linear transformation techniqueJournal of Biomechanics, 1994
- Aposematism or startle? Predators learn their responses to the defenses of preyCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1990
- Acoustic and behavioural analyses of the sounds produced by some species of Nearctic Arctiidae (Lepidoptera)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1977