Insights into the electrophysiology study versus electrocardiographic monitoring trial: Its programmed stimulation protocol may introduce bias when assessing long-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy

This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:

• Safety and efficacy of oral sotalol for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias refractory to other antiarrhythmic agents
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
• A Comparison of Seven Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1993
• Reproducibility of electrophysiologic testing during antiarrhythmic therapy for ventricular arrhythmias secondary to coronary artery disease
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
• Immediate reproducibility of electrically induced sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia before and during antiarrhythmic therapy
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
• Day-to-day reproducibility of antiarrhythmic drug trials using programmed extrastimulus techniques for ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with coronary artery disease
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
• Effects of sotalol on ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation produced by programmed electrical stimulation: Comparison with other antiarrhythmic agents
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
• The ESVEM trial. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring for selection of antiarrhythmic therapy of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The ESVEM Investigators.
  Circulation, 1989
• Day-to-day reproducibility of responses to right ventricular programmed electrical stimulation: Implications for serial drug testing
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
• A prospective comparison of triple extrastimuli and left ventricular stimulation in studies of ventricular tachycardia induction.
  Circulation, 1984
• Decreased incidence of antiarrhythmic drug efficacy at electrophysiologic study associated with the use of a third extrastimulus
  American Heart Journal, 1982