Abstract
Using plant-level data from the U.S. steel industry, the paper tests and finds support for the hypothesis that firms in a contradicting industry first disinvest from, and then close, their high-cost plants. An investment decision model is estimated using a panel data set composed of the major replacement investments made in 43 steel plants during the years 1960-1981. The results indicate that the firms disinvested from those plants least likely to remain profitable in an environment of strong competition from imports and minimills, and stagnating domestic demand.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: