Abstract
The developmental ability of nuclear transplant sheep embryos derived from in vitro matured oocytes was studied by controlling cell-cycle coordination of donor embryonic nuclei and recipient cytoplasts. Oocytes were recovered from nonatretic antral follicles of adult sheep ovaries and cocultured with follicle shells in M199-based medium supplemented with gonadotrophins in a nonstatic system. Effective activation of IVM oocytes was obtained by applying two pulses of 1.0 kv/cm 22 min apart in inositol-based electroporation medium to oocytes matured in vitro for 27 hr. Synthesis of DNA (S-phase) was assessed by BrdU incorporation and was found to initiate around 5 hpa (hours postactivation) and to persist until 18 hpa. Mitotic blastomeres were induced by treating embryos with 6.6 μM nocodazole for 14–17 hr. Three types of transfers were compared directly: “S → S,” early embryonic nuclei (mostly in S-phase) were transferred to presumptive S-phase cytoplasts; “M → MII,” nocodazole-treated embryonic nuclei (most in M-phase) were transferred to MII-phase cytoplasts; and control (S → MII), conventional nuclear transfer of fusion and activation simultaneously. The results showed that fusion and recovery rates did not differ among the three groups. However, after 6 days of in vivo culture, the morula and blastocyst formation rate was significantly higher for the M → MII combination than for the control (28.3% vs. 8.1%, P < 0.05), while no significant differences in developmental rate were observed between S → S and M → MII, and between S → S and control, though developmental rate was also increased for S → S compared to control (20.9% vs. 8.1%, P > 0.05). Transfer of blastocysts derived from M → MII or S → S nuclear cytoplasmic reconstitution to synchronized recipient ewes resulted in the birth of lambs. These data suggest that in vitro matured oocytes can support full-term development of nuclear transplant sheep embryos when the cell cycle of nucleus and cytoplasm is coordinated, and that M → MII nuclear transfer might be an efficient and simple way to improve the developmental competence of the reconstituted embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 47:255–264, 1997.