Nuclear transfer in sheep embryos: The effect of cell-cycle coordination between nucleus and cytoplasm and the use of in vitro matured oocytes
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Reproduction and Development
- Vol. 47 (3) , 255-264
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(199707)47:3<255::aid-mrd4>3.0.co;2-k
Abstract
The developmental ability of nuclear transplant sheep embryos derived from in vitro matured oocytes was studied by controlling cell-cycle coordination of donor embryonic nuclei and recipient cytoplasts. Oocytes were recovered from nonatretic antral follicles of adult sheep ovaries and cocultured with follicle shells in M199-based medium supplemented with gonadotrophins in a nonstatic system. Effective activation of IVM oocytes was obtained by applying two pulses of 1.0 kv/cm 22 min apart in inositol-based electroporation medium to oocytes matured in vitro for 27 hr. Synthesis of DNA (S-phase) was assessed by BrdU incorporation and was found to initiate around 5 hpa (hours postactivation) and to persist until 18 hpa. Mitotic blastomeres were induced by treating embryos with 6.6 μM nocodazole for 14–17 hr. Three types of transfers were compared directly: “S → S,” early embryonic nuclei (mostly in S-phase) were transferred to presumptive S-phase cytoplasts; “M → MII,” nocodazole-treated embryonic nuclei (most in M-phase) were transferred to MII-phase cytoplasts; and control (S → MII), conventional nuclear transfer of fusion and activation simultaneously. The results showed that fusion and recovery rates did not differ among the three groups. However, after 6 days of in vivo culture, the morula and blastocyst formation rate was significantly higher for the M → MII combination than for the control (28.3% vs. 8.1%, P < 0.05), while no significant differences in developmental rate were observed between S → S and M → MII, and between S → S and control, though developmental rate was also increased for S → S compared to control (20.9% vs. 8.1%, P > 0.05). Transfer of blastocysts derived from M → MII or S → S nuclear cytoplasmic reconstitution to synchronized recipient ewes resulted in the birth of lambs. These data suggest that in vitro matured oocytes can support full-term development of nuclear transplant sheep embryos when the cell cycle of nucleus and cytoplasm is coordinated, and that M → MII nuclear transfer might be an efficient and simple way to improve the developmental competence of the reconstituted embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 47:255–264, 1997.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- DNA synthesis, microtubule and nuclear dynamics in porcine parthenotesZygote, 1996
- In vitro and in vivo Development of Cloned Ovine Embryos using in vitro and in vivo Matured OocytesReproduction in Domestic Animals, 1995
- Improved Development to Blastocyst of Ovine Nuclear Transfer Embryos Reconstructed during the Presumptive S-Phase of Enucleated Activated OocytesBiology of Reproduction, 1994
- Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Interactions during the First Cell Cycle of Nuclear Transfer Reconstructed Bovine Embryos: Implications for Deoxyribonucleic Acid Replication and Development1Biology of Reproduction, 1993
- Influence of recipient oocyte cell cycle stage on DNA synthesis, nuclear envelope breakdown, chromosome constitution, and development in nuclear transplant bovine embryosMolecular Reproduction and Development, 1993
- Birth of lambs after in vitro maturation, fertilization, and coculture with oviductal cellsMolecular Reproduction and Development, 1991
- Relationship between Nuclear Remodeling and Development in Nuclear Transplant Rabbit Embryos1Biology of Reproduction, 1991
- Age dependence of bovine oocyte activationGamete Research, 1989
- Ultrastructure of cell fusion and premature chromosome condensation (PCC) of thymocyte nuclei in metaphase II mouse oocytesBiology of the Cell, 1986
- Effect of follicle cells on the maturation and developmental competence of ovine oocytes matured outside the follicleGamete Research, 1984