Pre-established categories don't exist: Consequences for language description and typology
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Linguistic Typology
- Vol. 11 (1) , 119-132
- https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty.2007.011
Abstract
1. Introduction Structural categories of grammar (such as clitic, affix, compound, adjective, pronoun, dative, subject, passive, diphthong, coronal) have to be posited by linguists and by children during acquisition. This would be easier if they simply had to choose from a list of pre-established categories. However, existing proposals for what such a list might be are still heavily based on the Latin and English grammatical tradition. Thus, descriptive linguists still have no choice but to adopt the Boasian approach of positing special language-particular categories for each language. Theorists often resist it, but the crosslinguistic evidence is not converging on a smallish set of possibly innate categories. On the contrary, almost every newly described language presents us with some “crazy” new category that hardly fits existing taxonomies. Although there is thus no good evidence for pre-established categories, linguists still often engage in category-assignment controversies such as “Is the Tagalog ang-phrase a subject or a topic?”, “Is German er a pronoun or a determiner?”, “Are Mandarin Chinese property words adjectives or verbs?”, or “Is the Romanian definite article a clitic or a suffix?”Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Against Formal PhonologyLanguage, 2005
- French subject clitics are not agreement markersLingua, 2005
- Compound or phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterionEnglish Language and Linguistics, 2004
- Exemplar dynamicsPublished by John Benjamins Publishing Company ,2001
- When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English?English Language and Linguistics, 1998
- Are Grammatical Relations Universal?Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company ,1997
- Word Order TypologyPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1995
- Does English really have case?Journal of Linguistics, 1995
- The affix-stem distinction: A Cognitive Grammar analysis of data from Orizaba NahuatlCognitive Linguistics, 1992
- Relativethat– a centennial disputeJournal of Linguistics, 1985