Is a New Evolutionary Synthesis Necessary?
Open Access
- 28 August 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 213 (4511) , 967-971
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.213.4511.967
Abstract
The current (synthetic) theory of evolution has been criticized on the grounds that it implies that macroevolutionary processes (speciation and morphological diversification) are gradual. The extent to which macroevolution is gradual or punctuational remains to be ascertained. Macroevolutionary processes are underlain by microevolutionary phenomena and are compatible with the synthetic theory of evolution. But microevolutionary principles are compatible with both gradualism and punctualism; therefore, logically they entail neither. Thus, macroevolution and microevolution are decoupled in the important sense that macroevolutionary patterns cannot be deduced from microevolutionary principles.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evolutionary Theory Under FireScience, 1980
- Ontogenesis and Morphological DiversificationAmerican Zoologist, 1980
- Evolutionary Mechanisms of Limb Loss in TetrapodsEvolution, 1978
- Genetic Differentiation During the Speciation Process in DrosophilaEvolution, 1974
- Genetic Divergence in Body Size Among Experimental Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura Kept at Different TemperaturesEvolution, 1973
- Species of DrosophilaScience, 1972
- Models of SpeciationScience, 1968
- Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular LevelNature, 1968
- The Structure of ScienceAmerican Journal of Physics, 1961
- What is an Adaptive Trait?The American Naturalist, 1956