Selecting donors of platelets for refractory patientson the basis of HLA antibody specificity
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Transfusion
- Vol. 40 (12) , 1446-1456
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40121446.x
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients who are refractory to platelet transfusion as a result of HLA alloimmunization are generally given HLA-matched or crossmatched platelets. However, HLA-matched platelets that are matched at HLA-A and -B loci (A-matched) or those without any mismatched or cross-reactive antigens (BU-matched) are frequently unavailable. A disadvantage of crossmatching is that crossmatched platelets have a shelf life of only 5 days, so that crossmatch tests must be performed frequently for patients requiring long-term platelet transfusions. An alternative method is the selection of platelets according to the patient's HLA antibody specificity, called the antibody specificity prediction (ASP) method. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anti-human globulin-enhanced microlymphocytotoxicity test modified by a double addition of serum and a computer program were used to determine the specificity of patients' HLA antibodies. Platelet crossmatching was performed with a solid-phase adherence assay. The percentage of platelet recovery (PPR) was determined in 1621 platelet transfusions in an observational study in 114 patients, and the PPR of platelets selected by the ASP method was compared with the PPR of those that were HLA-matched, crossmatched, or randomly selected. The numbers of potential donors in files of HLA-typed donors as identified by HLA matching vs. the ASP method were determined. RESULTS: After adjustments for covariates, the mean ± SEM PPR was similar for HLA-matched (21 ± 4%), cross-matched (23 ± 4%), and ASP-selected (24 ± 3%) platelets and was significantly lower for randomly selected (15 ± 1.4%) platelets. For 29 alloimmunized HLA-typed patients, the mean number of potential donors found in a file of 7247 HLA-typed donors was 6 who were an HLA-A match (median = 1), 33 who were an HLA-BU match (median = 20), and 1426 who were identified by the ASP method (median = 1365). CONCLUSION: The ASP method of donor selection for refractory alloimmunized patients appears as effective as HLA matching or crossmatching. Far more donors are identified in a file of HLA-typed donors by the ASP method than by HLA matching, and this indicates that the ASP method provides important advantages regarding the availability of compatible platelet components.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Platelet‐specific antibodies in transfused patientsEuropean Journal of Haematology, 1996
- Platelet refractoriness and alloimmunization in pediatric oncology and bone marrow transplant patientsTransfusion, 1995
- White cell reduction in platelet concentrates and packed red cells by filtration: a multicenter clinical trial. The Trap Study GroupTransfusion, 1995
- Epitope specificity of HLA class I alloantibodies I. Frequency analysis of antibodies to private versus public specificities in potential transplant recipientsHuman Immunology, 1994
- Relative Importance of Immune and Non‐Immune Causes of Platelet RefractorinessVox Sanguinis, 1994
- Correction of the corrected count increment unitsTransfusion, 1993
- HLA antibody enhancement by double addition of serum: use in platelet donor selectionTransfusion, 1992
- Selection of platelets for refractory patients by HLA matching and prospective crossmatchingTransfusion, 1992
- Factors influencing 20‐hour increments after platelet transfusionTransfusion, 1991
- Optimization by Simulated AnnealingScience, 1983