WHY BREEDING TIME HAS NOT RESPONDED TO SELECTION FOR EARLIER BREEDING IN A SONGBIRD POPULATION
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 November 2006
- Vol. 60 (11) , 2381-2388
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01872.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shifts in caterpillar biomass phenology due to climate change and its impact on the breeding biology of an insectivorous birdOecologia, 2005
- Selection on Heritable Phenotypic Plasticity in a Wild Bird PopulationScience, 2005
- Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the ‘animal model’Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2004
- When environmental variation short-circuits natural selectionTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003
- NATURAL SELECTION AND INHERITANCE OF BREEDING TIME AND CLUTCH SIZE IN THE COLLARED FLYCATCHEREvolution, 2003
- Seasonal Variation in the Incidence of Double Broods: The Date Hypothesis Fits Better than the Quality HypothesisJournal of Animal Ecology, 1996
- Laying Date in the Coot: Effects of Age and Mate ChoiceJournal of Animal Ecology, 1992
- Long-Term Decline in Body Size in a Snow Goose Population: Evidence of Environmental Degradation?Journal of Animal Ecology, 1991
- Directional Selection and Clutch Size in BirdsThe American Naturalist, 1990
- Heritability of body size in a natural population of the Great Tit (Parus major) and its relation to age and environmental conditions during growthGenetics Research, 1988