The Middlemost Choice on Attitude Items
- 1 March 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 6 (1) , 97-101
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728061014
Abstract
If respondents to a Thurstone-type attitude scale can make a middlemost response, in addition to agreement or disagreement, what concept underlies such responses when they are made? Ambivalence, neutrality, and uncertainty are three processes that can determine choice of the middlemost response. Definitions reflecting one of these processes or an innocuous control definition were presented to subjects as appropriate for a middlemost response on each of two attitude scales. The definitions presented differentially affected use of the middlemost response on one of the two scales. On that scale, an ambivalence definition yielded the greatest use of the middlemost response and differed from an uncertainty definition, which yielded the least use.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The "Cannot Decide" Option in Thurstone-Type Attitude ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
- The Neutral Point on a Likert ScaleThe Journal of Psychology, 1977
- "Don't Know": Item Ambiguity or Respondent Uncertainty?Public Opinion Quarterly, 1976
- An Analysis of the Meaning of the Question Mark Response Category in Attitude ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1975
- What We Now Know About "I Don't Knows"Public Opinion Quarterly, 1975
- On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique.Psychological Bulletin, 1972
- Fictitious Groups and the Generality of Prejudice: An Artifact of Scales without Neutral CategoriesPsychological Reports, 1971
- A critique of 'neutral' items in attitude scales constructed by the method of equal appearing intervals.Psychological Review, 1946