A Theory of Professionalization in Politics
- 1 September 1970
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 64 (3) , 865-878
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1953468
Abstract
Professionalization, in customary usage, refers to the assimilation of the standards and values prevalent in a given profession. Every profession, including politics, tends to have some set or sets of values that are widely held and which define what it means to be a “professional” within that field. These values are important because they affect the likelihood that the individual will achieve success in his profession. If the values are widely held, those that deviate from them are likely to be sanctioned by their colleagues, and people who fail to maintain the minimal standards of their profession are not likely to obtain professional advancement. Those who do behave according to the dominant values of their profession, however, are likely to be accorded the status of “professional” in the eyes of their colleagues, and that designation will contribute to the success of their careers. In the profession of politics, as in other professions, there is seldom one set of standards and values that prevails in all places at all times. These normative elements are likely to vary from political system to political system, to vary within a political system, and to vary within the profession of politics over time. In a highly centralized local political organization, for example, the achievement and maintenance of a position is likely to depend upon such values as deference and loyalty to the leaders of the political hierarchy.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Recruitment of Political Leaders: A Study of Citizen-Politicians, by Kenneth Prewitt ; The Threads of Public Policy: A Study in Policy Leadership, by Robert Eyestone ; City Mangers in Legislative Politics, by Robert O. Loveridge ; Local Interest Politics: A One-Way Street, by Betty H. Zisk ; Labyrinths of Democracy: Adaptations, Linkages, Representation, and Policies in Urban Politics, by Heinz Eulau and Kenneth PrewittPolitical Science Quarterly, 1975
- A Theory of the Calculus of VotingAmerican Political Science Review, 1968
- American Cities: Their Social Characteristics.American Sociological Review, 1966
- The Ambivalent Social Status of the American PoliticianThe Western Political Quarterly, 1959
- An Empirical Scale of Prestige Status of OccupationsAmerican Sociological Review, 1943