Neuromuscular blockers--a means of palliation?
Open Access
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 28 (3) , 170-172
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.3.170
Abstract
As we die, our respiratory pattern is altered and we seem to gasp and struggle for each breath. Such gasping is commonly seen as a clear sign of dyspnoea and suffering by families and loved ones, however, it is unclear whether it is perceived at all by the dying person. Narcotics and sedatives do not seem to affect these gasping respirations. In this issue of the Journal of Medical Ethics, we are asked to consider whether the last gasp of a dying patient could be or, perhaps, even should be avoided by administering neuromuscular blockers to palliate dying patients. For many reasons, such as our current failure to alleviate pain and distress, stories of inadequate analgesia and sedation in critically ill paralysed patients and the inability to know the intent—whether to palliate or to euthanise—it would seem that administering neuromuscular blockers should not be ethically permissible.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The agony of agonal respiration: is the last gasp necessary?Journal of Medical Ethics, 2002
- Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia Are we treading a fine line? Paralysing agents may be given up to but not at or beyond the point of extubation The parents' perspective on withdrawing treatment The doctrine of double effect is difficult but not impossible to applyBMJ, 2001
- Pharmacologic Paralysis and Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation at the End of LifeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- The Rule of Double EffectArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1999
- The Rule of Double Effect — A Critique of Its Role in End-of-Life Decision MakingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- The Supreme Court Speaks — Not Assisted Suicide but a Constitutional Right to Palliative CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Who is Entitled to Double Effect?Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1991