Examining change using regression analysis: Three approaches compared
- 1 April 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Sociological Spectrum
- Vol. 11 (2) , 127-145
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.1991.9981960
Abstract
Although social scientists are frequently faced with the task of assessing the correlates of change, the methods for doing so are often misunderstood. This analysis compares three approaches for dealing with this task using regression procedures: (a) change or difference score (Time2 ‐ Time1 [T2 ‐ T1] as the dependent variable with T1 score included as a covariate; (b) T2 score as the dependent variable and T1, score as a covariate; and (c) residualized T2 score as the dependent variable. All are shown to result in identical interpretations of the relationship between substantive variables and change. We argue, however, that the use of difference scores as the dependent variable is generally preferable (when T1, score is controlled) because the resulting analysis deals directly with adjusted change.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Saying it Wrong with Figures: A Comment on ZeiselAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1982
- Disagreement over the Evaluation of a Controlled ExperimentAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1982
- Correlated Denominators in Multiple Regression and Change AnalysesSociological Methods & Research, 1979
- Analyzing Panel DataPublished by SAGE Publications ,1979
- How we should measure "change": Or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- A general linear model for studying growth.Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- The Influence of the Chance Imperfections of Measures upon the Relation of Initial Score to Gain or Loss.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1924