Comparison of hexachlorophane and chlorhexidine powders in prevention of neonatal infection.
- 1 April 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Vol. 55 (4) , 277-280
- https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.55.4.277
Abstract
The protective effect of treating the skin of newborn infants with powders containing 1% chlorhexidine or 0.33% hexachlorophane was compared. Each was equally effective in preventing colonization and infection by Staphylococcus aureus. In contrast, the skin became profusely colonized by coagulase-negative staphylococci, irrespective of the poweder used. Venous blood concentrations of chlorhexidine were low or undetectable in the few infants whose blood was analyzed.This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Absorption of chlorhexidine from the intact skin of newborn infants.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1979
- Percutaneous absorption of chlorhexidine in ratsToxicology Letters, 1978
- Accidental percutaneous hexachlorophane intoxication in children.BMJ, 1977
- HEXACHLOROPHANE DUSTING-POWDER FOR NEWBORN INFANTSThe Lancet, 1975
- Cutaneous absorption of hexachlorophene in low-birth-weight infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1973
- STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTION IN CERVICAL GLANDS OF INFANTSThe Lancet, 1972
- STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTION IN CERVICAL GLANDS OF INFANTSThe Lancet, 1972
- ABSORPTION OF HEXACHLOROPHANE FROM INFANTS' SKINThe Lancet, 1972
- DERMAL ABSORPTION OF HEXACHLOROPHANE IN INFANTSThe Lancet, 1971
- STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTION IN A MATERNITY HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROLThe Lancet, 1958