Six Months of Maintenance Chemotherapy After Intensified Treatment for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia of Childhood
- 7 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 18 (7) , 1508-1516
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.7.1508
Abstract
PURPOSE: We postulated that intensification of chemotherapy immediately after remission induction might reduce the leukemic cell burden sufficiently to allow an abbreviated period of antimetabolite therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred forty-seven children (ages 1 to 15 years) with previously untreated acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were enrolled onto the Tokyo L92–13 study, which excluded patients with mature B-cell ALL and patients less than 1 year old. One hundred twenty-four patients were classified as standard risk, 122 as high risk, and 101 as extremely high risk, according to age, peripheral-blood leukocyte count, selected genetic abnormalities, and immunophenotype. All subjects received four drugs for remission induction, followed by a risk-directed multidrug intensification phase and therapy for presymptomatic leukemia in the CNS. Maintenance chemotherapy with oral mercaptopurine and methotrexate was administered for 6 months, with all treatment stopped by 1 year after diagnosis. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival rates for all patients were 59.5% ± 3.4% and 81.5% ± 2.2%, respectively, at 5.5 years after diagnosis. EFS rates by risk category were similar (60.2% ± 6.0% for standard risk, 57.7% ± 5.6% for high risk, and 62.5% ± 5.7% for extremely high risk), whereas overall survival rates differed significantly (91.2% ± 2.7%, 80.0% ± 4.1%, and 72.1% ± 4.5%, respectively, P < .0001 by the log-rank test). There were 107 relapses. Eighty-five (79.4%) of these 107 patients achieved second complete remissions, with subsequent EFS rates of 61.5% ± 7.9% (standard risk), 42.6% ± 8.1% (high risk), and 9.6% ± 6.4% (extremely high risk). Of the five risk factors analyzed, only the response to prednisolone monotherapy among extremely high-risk patients proved important. CONCLUSION: Early treatment intensification did not compensate for a truncated phase of maintenance chemotherapy in children with standard- or high-risk ALL. However, 6 months of antimetabolite treatment seemed adequate for extremely high-risk patients who were good responders to prednisolone and received intensified chemotherapy that included high-dose cytarabine early in the clinical course.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Continuing (maintenance) therapy in lymphoblastic leukaemia: lessons from MRC UKALL XBritish Journal of Haematology, 1997
- The influence of maximum supportive care on dose compliance and survivalKlinische Padiatrie, 1997
- Duration and intensity of maintenance chemotherapy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: overview of 42 trials involving 12 000 randomised childrenThe Lancet, 1996
- Blast cell methotrexate-polyglutamate accumulation in vivo differs by lineage, ploidy, and methotrexate dose in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1994
- Biology and treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemiaThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1994
- Maintenance chemotherapy and cure of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemiaThe Lancet, 1991
- Results of Medical Research Council Childhood Leukaemia Trial UKALL VIII (Report to the Medical Research Council on behalf of the Working Party on Leukaemia in Childhood)British Journal of Haematology, 1991
- Maintenance Chemotherapy for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Should Dosage Be Guided by White Blood Cell Counts?Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, 1990
- Proposals for the Classification of the Acute Leukaemias French‐American‐British (FAB) Co‐operative GroupBritish Journal of Haematology, 1976